Sunday, February 27, 2011

WTF?!


Rumer Willis for Badgley Mischka

Rumer Willis/ for Badgley Mischka?!?!?!? WAS NOBODY ELSE AVAILABLE?!?!?!?!?

Am I the only one that longs for the days when MODELS and not ACTORS AND ACTRESSES were hired for the modeling jobs?!

Share/Bookmark

30 comments:

...love Maegan said...

well, it looks like they've covered most of her face with her hair. That's plus at least.

You're Lucky I Don't Have a Gun... said...

at least they used her hair/hand to minimize that monster jawline.

Vivienne said...

Haaaa! What they just said.

Morgan said...

Ugh! So terrible....

Christi said...

Yeah, I'm speechless.

wallycrawler said...

That's not Rumer? That's her sister AirBrush Willis.

Ya know what they say? Ya can't polish a turd. Perfect example.

Caroline said...

Oh God...

Marisa said...

Yeah...umm....What?

Farah said...

I know what you mean..It's a good shot for the dress bit I'd like to blank out her face...

bananas. said...

airbrush willis is right! that is so not her body.

but uh her dad...hot. love him. lol.

vint junky said...

Who?
(see what I mean, clueless!)
x

Kirsty said...

Woah. Are they trying to disguise her odd face by making her pose like a hooker? Either way it does NOT make me want to look twice. I'd honestlly still rather look at her dad (or even better, step dad) in that dress...

rach said...

talk about airbrushing to the extreme! her legs/ass don't even come close to looking normal together- if she was to stand up there would be some huge proportional problems haha! And if you are going to use a celeb- why use one that has a face like that? no offense Rumer, but seriously? Yes i agree- stop lining actors pockets and use a model!

Andhari said...

Seriously, not what I would expect for such a premium clothing brand. What's wrong with their usual lanky eastern european models?

Haute World said...

Photoshop much? I'm with you on the whole hiring models for modeling jobs. It's bad enough actresses are already featured on every cover Vogue. Something tells me, Demi will be wearing a lot of Badgley Mischka in public so her daughter could get this deal. And considering most actors can barely act or pose, they should at least stick to doing only one thing badly.

blueviolet said...

Amen. There is no way on God's green earth she would have been chosen were it not for her celebrity parents.

Mandy said...

I am laughing (and agreeing) with all these comments. Poor girl, she just tries so hard. ;)

Dancing Branflake said...

I soo agree! Whatever happened to the term covergirl? And don't get me started when they use actresses for the runway. I don't care if their picture will be taken and put in magazines, they are actresses!

Stacy Conner said...

AMEN SISTAH!! I could not agree more. I am happy when on those rare occasions when I get a magazine and a real model is on the cover. I remember fondly the late 80's/early 90's supermodel days... Those were the days...

TK Kerouac said...

she seems to have inherited the upper face of Demi & the Lower jawline of Bruce
damn those genetics

Sabine said...

Absolutely. With the unemployment rate being as high as it is they can't take all the jobs!

morgan said...

I agree, she's fugly. But thanks to master photography and a good hand at photoshop, I think she looks pretty good here.

Trixie said...

I don't want to be mean but it appears I have no way to stop it. She is definitely not model material and if she didn't have two famous parents there is no way in hell that girl would be doing anything in Hollywood. Period. I hope she thanks the Hollywood Gods for her luck every night when she looks in the mirror.

jenna ♥ a little blue said...

what in the world??? this is sooo random. but totally honest, i didn't read the words at first so i had no idea it was her.

at least if they are going to skip over using legit models, they could have chosen someone more relevant??!?

Down and Out Chic said...

i was thinking about this the other day. i wonder if models feel slighted for no longer getting magazine covers and basically being replaced by celebs. i find it rather annoying myself.

Phoenix said...

I have this same problem with fashion magazines. The cover "models" are all actresses now - I think Lucky might be the only one who occasionally uses a model that is not an actress (and the model, in the interview, is usually trying to "break out" into acting, so scratch that last thought.)

I get it, but I don't want to. Celebs sell more than models, and most of the time now agents and managers are pushing for their actors and actresses to book the covers of magazines to push their latest projects in a big cross marketing blitz.

But seriously. Ugh. (says the actress!)

Kathryn said...

Sure doesn't make me want to be associated with their products. They would do better to hire some minor reality show bimbo that at least looked passable.

Have to feel bad for the girl..to have two good looking parents and end up getting to worst of both and looking like you were beat with the ugly stick.

Have to agree though; if she weren't the daughter of celebs she would not make it as any sort of "model" or "actress".

Lorena said...

I do not know where to begin !
I mean, the butt!!!?? what's with that disproportioned stripper butt ?
Her head is huge. HUG E
HUGEeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I think she did this for free, there is no way in hell anyone would pay her for that.

Heather Taylor said...

Me too! Can't believe she landed that campaign, she reminds me of a potato in so many ways.

God's Favorite Shoes! said...

Clarification...you call her an actress or the daughter of an actor/actress??

Let's be clear. And really...was no one available! Nobody?? Not even Snookie?